We are using a combination of a small number of people + software + servers and robots.
We are promoting a new era of company management.
I hope to share some of the process in this section.
In Mogic, there are many educational things going on.
The reason for the vagueness of the term "education-like" is that, like a classroom, there is no solid curriculum or performance goals, and the way we do things can change according to random events.
There have been various activities such as the creation of an idea service called MicroTech, the creation of Lassi, and the creation of a bouldering wall.
I've been doing this kind of education for a long time now, and I know that it has benefits that cannot be described in a few words, but why this style of education is actually better has not been clearly understood even among those who practice it.
I recently read a book that made me think of this, so I'll quote it here.
The Anthropology of Hiding
The Anthropology of Hiding
Students will eventually forget the content of their college classes.
I can hardly remember the contents of the lectures I took at university.
There is no way to know in advance what the benefits will be, or when the tangible results will be seen, either in education or by students.
Probably the only thing that remains in the students is "heat. The teacher cannot decide in advance what kind of energy the "heat" will turn into next in the student.
In the first place, students have the potential to be anything they want to be.
The words spoken in class, and the "learning" evoked therein, are not "products" that satisfy the needs of others.
It is a "gift" that is handed over without knowing how it will be received and without knowing what it will lead to.
omission (of middle part of a text)
Because it is a gift, the "effort" to do so cannot be converted into time or money, nor is it a subject that should be calculated for profit or loss.
If we view education as "labor" to be exchanged in the marketplace, as long as the "results" cannot be properly measured, it will always be the "right" answer to spend the least amount of effort.
If that is the case, then "education" becomes an exercise in futility.
In fact, you may have received very little, or you may have received something you never intended to give.
On the part of the teachers, only the "inability to reach" always remains.
I think that education is the act of continuing to give a gift to this unreachability.
Education is the act of continuing to give gifts toward this unreachability.
Perhaps it is because of the management policy that emphasizes teamwork that they do not see education as a cost effective way to improve skills, but as a gift.