Mogic considers

Money can buy time or it can't.

From a different place by chance.

"I'm thinking of covering the next round with debt (borrowing): ・・・・・・"
What do you think about raising equity here?"

I was asked for advice and returned similar feedback.

In other words, quite normal.

It's all well and good to raise money, but in the end it's not how you invest it (or how you burn it), but in what."

It is called.

Expression of burning money.

It is quite a thing, but it is often used in the business community.

As the word "cash burn rate" suggests, the idea is that spending large amounts of money quickly buys time and expertise.

Using the large amount of money raised through advances, the company quickly assembles talented people, rents a large office, decides on eye-catching partnerships, makes friends with reporters and editors, spreads awareness through commercials and social networking, plans future company values, and maximizes expectations before the funds run out, all over again.

If it works in a straight line, it is profitable, but there are some unexpected bottlenecks.

Money should speed up a lot of things, but some things can't be speeded up in any way.

For example, it would be easier to understand if we consider it in terms of a child's growth.

Even if you buy a year's worth of food and eat it in a week, it does not mean that you will immediately be the same height and weight you will be a year from now.

The point is that there are differences in speedups, and we should select those that can be properly sped up and those that cannot.

We'll invest in gradients in what we can speed up, but we'll keep a good eye on what we can't.

Since funds are at their peak when they are raised, I wonder if we will not be able to make things go well if we keep growing impatient in inverse proportion to the ever-decreasing amount of money.

From the Belief/Belief Horizon

When you have several generative AIs explore the same theme, or when you have two generative AIs poke differences into each other by narrowing down the theme, you may feel that they are climbing the same mountain from different routes, or that they are going to different mountains even though they are supposed to be on the same path.

The destination diverges with each answer, and each step you take leads you to the next branch.

The same generative AI will give different answers depending on the timing and nuances of the question.

As I looked at it from afar, I thought it looked a bit like path integrals in physics, so I'll quote a bit from it.

Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Path integral
h ttps:// w.wiki/4z2s

In classical mechanics (classical system), the state of motion of a certain mass (path of motion) is uniquely determined by solving the equations of motion once the initial state is determined. On the other hand, in a quantum system, the path cannot be determined uniquely as in a classical system because of the existence of quantum uncertainty (quantum fluctuation).

There are several methods for determining the motion of elementary particles and other objects in quantum systems, one of which is the path integral method.

In the formula for path integral, the paths connecting the starting and ending points are innumerable and globally distributed. The result is obtained by computationally combining those innumerable paths. The probability distribution of the measured values obtained by the path integral method agrees with the probability distribution obtained by the usual operator form.
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

It is a complicated description, but I think what he is trying to say is that "the road may always be a little different.

It's not so much that we set out to reach a goal, but rather that we set out and then reach a goal, but always on a different road, so the goal might be different.

Since this is so different from search engines, which are based on classical logic operations, we have no choice but to move away from the "right/wrong, believe/believe horizon".